Ấn phẩm:
The political and scientific challenges in evaluating compulsory drug treatment centers in Southeast Asia.
Đang tải...
Xem mô tả
11
Xem & Tải
1
Nhan đề khác
Tóm tắt
Background In Vietnam, like many countries in Southeast Asia, the commonly used approach of center-based compulsory drug treatment (CCT) has been criticized on human rights ground. Meanwhile, community-based voluntary methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has been implemented for nearly a decade with promising results. Reform-minded leaders have been seeking empirical evidence of the costs and effectiveness associated with these two main treatment modalities. Conducting evaluations of these treatments, especially where randomization is not ethical, presents challenges. The aim of this paper is to discuss political challenges and methodological issues when conducting cost-effectiveness studies within the context of a non-democratic Southeast Asian country. Methods A retrospective analysis of the political and scientific challenges that were experienced in the study design, sample size determination, government approval and ethics approvals, participant recruitment, data collection, and determination of sources, and quantification of cost and effectiveness data was undertaken. As a consequence of the non-randomized design, analysis of patient characteristics for both treatment types was undertaken to identify the magnitude of baseline group differences. Concordance between self-reported heroin use and urine drug testing was undertaken to determine the reliability of self-report data in a politically challenging environment. Results We demonstrate that conducting research around compulsory treatment in a non-democratic society is feasible, yet it is politically challenging and requires navigation between science and politics. We also demonstrate that engagement with the government decision makers in the research conception, implementation, and dissemination of the results increases the likelihood of research evidence being considered for change in a contentious drug policy area. Conclusions Local empirical evidence on the comparative cost-effectiveness of CCT and MMT in a Southeast Asian setting is critical to consideration of more holistic, humane, and effective drug-dependence treatment approaches, but the garnering of such evidence is very challenging.
Tác giả
Thu, Vuong
Nhu, Nguyen
Giang, Le
Shanahan, Marian
Ali, Robert
Ritter, Alison
Người hướng dẫn
Nơi xuất bản
Nhà xuất bản
Năm xuất bản
2017
ISSN tạp chí
Nhan đề tập
Từ khóa chủ đề
Compulsory treatment , Cost-effectiveness , Heroin use , Methadone treatment , Southeast Asia
Bộ sưu tập
URI
Tài liệu tham khảo
Thông tin bản quyền
Tệp tin
The political and scientific challenges in evaluating compulsory drug treatment centers in Southeast Asia..pdf
Dung lượng: 483.37 KBĐịnh dạng: pdf
Lượt xem: 1 Lượt tải: 0